Using PPPoE and DMZ / Advanced DMZ for 'Bridge Mode' use of 3rd Party router on the HH4000 & Giga Hub

navderek
Contributor II

It would be great if Bell could confirm if they are going to update the FW on the HH4000 to enable a true bridge mode setup...also to stop the Wifi from automatically re-enabling itself anytime the HH4000 reboots itself. These are two MAJOR issues right now with the HH4000 and posted about on many forums (not just here).

It would be great if someone from Bell could chime in and let the community know if it is actually going to address these issues or not? If not, please explain why and please do not point to advanced DMZ as a solution because that doesn't actually work very well and severely impacts the performance on the Google Mesh (or any other pre-existing mesh setup). This is also discussed on many forums both on this one and externally by your customers.

We do realize the HH4000 is relatively new so there can be some improvements. We, as a community, just want to know if Bell plans to make those improvements or not.

Thanks,

-Derek

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AI Summary: 

When attempting to use a third-party router, customers frequently encounter networking challenges due to the absence of a true 'bridge mode'. This limitation has led to a variety of solutions involving PPPoE and the Advanced DMZ feature to avoid issues like double NAT; where two devices on the network are performing Network Address Translation (NAT). Double NAT can lead to problems with online gaming, port forwarding, and other applications that require a direct connection to the internet.

Some complications you may experience:

  • Wi-Fi auto re-enabling: Even when disabled, the Bell Home Hub's Wi-Fi can turn back on after a reboot.
  • Advanced DMZ limitations: Advanced DMZ can be unreliable, especially with third party mesh systems. PPPoE is preferred by users in this scenario.
  • IP lease and connectivity drops: Devices lose connection when the public IP changes, requiring manual reconfiguration.
  • Performance degradation: Speeds, especially download speeds can drop over time. A reboot or modem reset will be needed to restore.
  • No static IPs: IP changes cause disruptions. Using DDNS can be considered.

In response, Bell Community users have detailed two primary methods to approximate a bridge mode: PPPoE passthrough and the use of the Advanced DMZ feature.

User-Shared Solutions:

PPPoE Passthrough: Often described as more stable and straightforward; it involves configuring the third-party router to establish the PPPoE connection directly with Bell. This effectively bypasses the Bell Home Hub 4000, Giga Hub and Giga Hub 2.0's routing functions, providing the third-party router with its own public IP address. To do this, users typically need to obtain their "b1" username and password from Bell. While stable, a significant drawback of this method is a potential reduction in internet speeds, particularly on plans faster than 500 Mbps, as many consumer routers struggle with the overhead of PPPoE.

Advanced DMZ: This method involves placing the third-party router in the modem's "Advanced Demilitarized Zone." This exposes the third-party router directly to the internet, which can result in higher performance. However, this solution is often reported to be less stable. For instance, rebooting your router might necessitate a subsequent reboot of your Giga Hub/Giga Hub 2.0 to restore the internet connection. Some have also reported experiencing lag spikes with this configuration. When using Advanced DMZ, it is advised to leave the login information on the third-party router blank, as entering PPPoE credentials can cause the connection to fail.

Configuration Tips from the Bell Community:

  • When setting up either method, it's recommended to disable the Wi-Fi on the Bell Giga Hub/Giga Hub 2.0 to prevent interference.
  • For PPPoE passthrough, connecting the WAN port of the third-party router to any LAN port on the Bell hub and configuring the router with your b1 credentials is the general procedure.
  • For Advanced DMZ, users need to enable the feature in the Giga Hub/Giga Hub 2.0's settings and assign their third-party router to it. It's also highly recommended to not plug other devices directly into the Bell hub for security reasons when using Advanced DMZ.

Ultimately, the choice between PPPoE passthrough and Advanced DMZ depends on the user's priorities. If stability and ease of setup are paramount, PPPoE passthrough is often the recommended choice. For those who prioritize performance and are willing to troubleshoot potential instabilities, Advanced DMZ may be the preferred option.

 

 

11 208 142K
208 REPLIES 208

IKR

The UDM Pro has a robust firewall.

philipGood
Contributor II

Hello all, I'm going to add my voice here to the call for a proper Bridge Mode on this modem. Failing that, please allow us to buy the SFP so we can do our own thing. I appreciate that the modem ins included, but I don't want it. I just want the 3gbps internet connection that I am paying or. Nothing more, nothing less. 

Hello all. 

Been Looking everywhere for while but it seems no one have asked the exact question:

In ADMZ mode, when you just made sure all the settings were go to go and all settings was applied properly as guided in forums. When you do gaming for couple more hours, you would consistently getting some weird ping spikes and sometimes even loss of connection with server( all wired connections), and in the event of power outages, a reboot of router and modem would screw up everything, have to go back and reconfigure. 

POPPE: more stable and ez to set up, but regardless whatever high speed package you paid for, it’s going to capped around 1200 ish. If you wanted full speed for uploading task and you would have to go for ADMZ mode. 

Has anyone find a way to obtain proper speed and sustainable performance?

I must ask: Why Bell DONOT have true bridge mode? Your modem gives all kinds of weird problems since 2000, we want a simpler solution and ones will work in every aspect. 

Vanadiel
Community All-Star
Community All-Star

You sort of answered your own question: Equipment that supports PPPOE packets at gigabit speeds is few and far. There's a few that can go up to 2.5/2.5, but beyond that It's going to get costly fast.

Reason being is PPPOE is an old protocol and was never designed for gigabit connectivity. It was more for DSL and early high speed connections. It has a very high overhead and requires optimized processing for gigabit speeds.

If you would have a true bridge mode, you would need your own equipment that can process PPPOE packets at your profile speed. The HH4000 is designed to support PPPOE profiles at those speeds. Your equipment likely not, and you end up not being able to reach your profile speed cap.

The true solution would be for Bell to mover over to DHCP, and that would prevent the huge overhead and need to process PPPOE packets.

I am a Community All-Star and customer. I'm here to help by sharing my knowledge and experience. My views on Bell and the Community Forum are my own and not the views of Bell or any of its affiliates.

My router has 2 10G LAN/Wan and will support up to 10G  As I stated earlier I have every thing setup right.  Thing is some people will actually modify their 3000 and achieve “true bridge” mode or kinda of disassemble them and use their own modem after modifications, that’s a lot of work which I don’t want to do for now. But honestly if I can buy third party modem I would but Bell blocks it. 
 
And for PoPPe I agree with you and that’s why most people are frustrated as switch to DHCP will likely take forever as we are not in a competitive market for telecom companies, they can charge whatever and sitting on fat profits just like grocery in Canada nowadays. 
 
But I also mention ADMZ, which should’ve been an optimal choice due to its properties. But…. It’s not stable and getting tons of ping spikes and loss of connection when running online software requires consistent connection. I simply can’t find a way to have stable connection with decent speed, imagine having all the necessary equipment bought but ISP CANNOT get their xxxx together. 

Vanadiel
Community All-Star
Community All-Star

If you have a HH3000 you just remove the SFP+ module and plug it into a router/switch that supports PPPOE and you can put the HH3000 on a shelve.

https://www.dslreports.com/forum/r31118482-Yes-you-CAN-bypass-the-HomeHub-3000

Or you can use a media converter first if your equipment does not support SFP+: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXAF-fQJHqE

I am a Community All-Star and customer. I'm here to help by sharing my knowledge and experience. My views on Bell and the Community Forum are my own and not the views of Bell or any of its affiliates.

Unfortunately I was forced replace  to Giga. 

Vanadiel
Community All-Star
Community All-Star

Advanced DMZ is than your only option, but it comes with it's own issue and is not stable as far as I am concerned.

I am a Community All-Star and customer. I'm here to help by sharing my knowledge and experience. My views on Bell and the Community Forum are my own and not the views of Bell or any of its affiliates.

Yep. That’s exactly what my dilemma is. 
I could’ve have both, speed and consistent connection. But shockingly that’s a lot of ask considering Bell’s current offerings. 

Everyone has a different use case. For me ADMZ isn't stable. I have UDMP connected to 10Gbe on the Gigahub and use regular DMZ with DHCP. Stable speeds and low latency. Double NAT isn't an issue for my needs.

 

Thank you for sharing!

Do you play competitive game?( if so, “low latency” you reference with was using Admz/Poppe?)

May I know your configuration? 
please correct me if I am wrong:

DHCP was On for modem not router. Dmz on. That’s it?

 

No gaming. Internet latency <5ms.

Leave Gigahub doing the pppoe. DHCP on on the modem but assign fixed IP (on modem) for the UDM (I.e 192.168.2.100) Turn on DMZ on the modem and select the UDM MAC/IP you assigned. Connect 10GBe modem port to WAN port on UDMP.

Internet config on UDMP would be DHCP. It should pick up the static IP you assigned.

Make sure your UDM internal networks use different subnets. I.e use 10.10.1.x. Don't configure any internal networks to use 192.168.2.x

Thank you! I have never tried this configuration yet. 

Hopefully this one will work 

philipGood
Contributor II

@Vincentbk Can you let us know if you've tried this? If so, did it work? Would love to see a step by step on this method.